Percy vs Cuomo EDNY 21-cv-01421 Complaint

Case

Case 1:21-cv-01421 Document 1 Filed 03/17/21 Page 4 of 154 PageID #: 260 Koehler; Jonathan Redner; Lawrence Reichenberger; Mark Reisman; Mayer Rispler; Brian Rosenman; Kenneth Rozenberg; Berish Rubenstein; Dina Rubenstein; Rivkie Rubenstein; Ira Rubin; Malky Saffran; Boruch Schepps; Pamela Schepps; Nat Scherman; Richard Schildron; Samuel Schlesinger; Jacob Schoenberger; Michael Schwartz; Leslie Shafrank; Henry Shayovitz; Agnes Shemia; Jeff Shemia; Alexander Sherman; Israel Sherman; Leah Sherman; Nat Sherman; Samuel Sherman; Warren Sherman; Hindy Sirkis; Moshe Sirkis; Alexander Skoczlas; Joseph Skoczylas; Tali Skoczylas; Dominic Spira Md; Jonathan Steinberg; Miriam Steinberg; Ronald Stern; Mariam Sternberg; Lorraine Takesky; Mitch Teller; Kenneth Tesslar; Kenneth Tessler; Aaron Unger; Unknown; Eila Vinitzky; Yuliya Vinokurova; Jeffrey Vogel; Sherman Vogel; Peggy Weberman; Philip Weberman; Toby Weinberger; Zoltan Weinberger; Regina Weinstock; Ari Weiss; Berish Weiss; Berry Weiss; Micahel Weiss; Michael Weiss; Robyn Weiss; Shlomie Weiss; Chaya Willinger; Robert Wolf; Peyman Younesi; Mark Zaffrin; Ephraim Zagelbaum; Kenneth Zitter; David Zohler; Owner Operator Defendants Local 1199 of the Service Employees International Union Union Defendant, Oriska Insurance Company, Carrier Defendant, Rashbi Management, Inc., Trust Defendant. Oriska Corporation derivatively to the Carrier Defendant and by Subrogation to the Class, Derivative Defendant, 4

Case 1:21-cv-01421 Document 1 Filed 03/17/21 Page 5 of 154 PageID #: 261 TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPLAINT ............................................................................................................... 10 PRELUDE ............................................................................................................... 10 Lincoln ....................................................................................................................................10 Grant and Conkling ................................................................................................................ 11 Franklin Roosevelt .................................................................................................................. 12 Lyndon B. Johnson ................................................................................................................. 13 BASIS AND SUMMARY OF CAUSES FOR ACTION ...................................................... 14 PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL ACTION.................................................................... 22 JURISDICTION ............................................................................................................... 23 VENUE and PRIOR PROCEEDINGS .............................................................................. 23 PARTIES ............................................................................................................... 24 PLAINTIFF: ........................................................................................................................... 24 DEFENDANTS: ..................................................................................................................... 25 The State Officer Defendants named in their official and individual capacities are as follows: ............................................................................................................................................... 26 The Party-in-Interest Defendants are as follows: ................................................................. 26 Owner Operator Defendants are the owners and operators of Employers referred to as the Employer Defendants identified in a related case EDNY 21-cv-01366 as follows: ............... 28 Carrier, Derivative, and Trust Defendants are as follows: ..................................................... 41 Union Defendant ................................................................................................................... 42 Parties previously named in Case SDNY 73-cv-04279 who are not named here because the Percy Class does not have a controversy with the following former defendants: ................. 42 FACTS COMMON TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION .......................................................... 43 Precedent, Authority and Jurisdiction .................................................................................. 44 DEFENDANT GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK presented Executive Order 45 in an effort toward affirmative action, but it failed and has never been corrected, Percy undertakes self-help with the PERCY PROGRAM but is Stymied. ....................................... 46 NUMEROSITY ............................................................................................................... 48 CLASS ACTION COMMON ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ............................................. 48 JUDICIAL ECONOMY ..................................................................................................... 49 CLASS COUNSEL ............................................................................................................ 49 5