The Percy Program

It is a fight to level the playing field to be able to compete for jobs and careers on the basis of skills and make available apprentice training to all. In 1973 Al Percy launched a class action lawsuit to give workers like him a chance to better their lot in life. It would also ensure the availability of skilled workers to build the infrastructure of the future.

Views
4 years ago

Attachment 6 EDNY Hodge v Cuomo 21-cv-01421 Complaint

  • Text
  • Operator
  • Defendants
  • Percy
  • Employment
  • Intervention
  • Pageid
  • Nursing
  • Employers
  • Apprenticeship
  • Benefits
  • Attachment
  • Edny
  • Hodge
  • Cuomo
  • Complaint

Case

Case 1:21-cv-01421-NGG Case MDL No. 3011 Document 1 25-6 Filed 03/17/21 Filed 06/24/21 Page 86 Page of 154 86 of PageID 154 #: 342 funds which were not used for their intended and represented purpose. Intervention Pg. 128 Par 298. 488. The DOH was at best grossly negligent, bordering on intentional conduct in its management of Medicaid/Medicare payments to the benefit of certain of the Employers that provide Cost Reports upon which the rate per occupied bed was computed by the DOH in accordance with 10 N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. § 86-2.10. The DOH with gross negligent and conscious disregard, accepted the certified costs numbers that were accrued in Cost Reports to the DOH, failing to verify the representations of the Employers that the costs incurred were in accordance with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) directives for “administering the Medicare and Medicaid programs” and “interpret[ing] Medicare policies, procedures and rules”. CMS provides detailed guidance for completing Medicare Cost Reports in their Medicare Provider Reimbursement Manual covering expenses for commercial insurance or self-insured with funds held in a commercial bank. CMS specifies that certain fringe benefits qualify for inclusion in the hospital’s costs, including the cost of any health insurance premiums incurred on behalf of employees on behalf of the Employers, Part I, § 2144.4.4, 42 C.F.R. § 413.24(f)(4)(iv). The Provider Reimbursement Manual is authority to implement Medicare regulations. 489. It was a part of the scheme that the reimbursements received by the Defendants were diverted from and not used to fund the 114 Trusts with the Trust Defendant, the same funds identified as the Loss Retention Fund in the Lead Action. Intervention Pg. 129 Par 299. 490. Philipson personally or through agents, allegedly made purchases of insurance coverages or made recommendations with respect thereto, facilitating the placement of health, workers’ compensation and disability coverage, while furthering the scheme using the opportunity and superior knowledge, access and experience of Philipson to accomplish the embezzlement. Intervention Pg. 129 Par 300. 491. As a result of the relationship between Owner Operator Defendants and Philipson, including, but not limited to, their role of control and superior knowledge and information regarding the occupational and non-occupational benefit plans for employees, along with ownership in the Employers in common with other Owner Operator Defendants, caused the Employers to file Cost Reports to the DOH of costs expensed and payment of employee benefits. Intervention Pg. 129 Par 301. What Happened to the Monies Expensed in Cost Reports to Fund the ERISA Plan and Program? 492. The Employers received funds from Medicaid, Medicare, private pay, and insurance. Intervention Pg. 62 Par 68. 86

Case 1:21-cv-01421-NGG Case MDL No. 3011 Document 1 25-6 Filed 03/17/21 Filed 06/24/21 Page 87 Page of 154 87 of PageID 154 #: 343 493. The Employers electronically filed annual Cost Reports (Form RHCF-4) with the DOH for the years 2002 through the present, when in fact, the Plan funding reported in these Cost Reports was diverted for personal purposes instead of held to pay benefits under the Program. Intervention Pg. 62 Par 69. 494. Such funds received by the Defendants were diverted from and not used to fund the 114 Trust or otherwise used by the Owner Operator Defendants to pay or reimburse the payment of benefits paid to the Class on behalf of the Employers. Intervention Pg. 62 Par 70. 495. It was part of the scheme that from 2002 to the present, the Defendants would and did submit false and fraudulent annual Cost Reports to the DOH via interstate wire (electronic filing), to report expenses by the Employers. Intervention Pg. 62 Par 71. 496. It was part of the scheme, as a result of the relationship between Owner Operator Defendants and Defendant Philipson, including, but not limited to, their role and superior knowledge and information regarding the occupational and non-occupational benefit plans for Employers’ employees, along with ownership in the Employers in common makes the Owner Operator Defendants, knowledgeable of the Cost Reports represented and submitted to the DOH. Intervention Pg. 63 Par 77, Pg. 64 Par 78. 497. Employers reported in Cost Reports to the DOH expenses for employee benefits which included statements that insurance coverage was being provided by Allstate as represented by its billing to the Employers. Intervention Pg. 64 Par 79, Pg. 65 Par 83, Pg. 65 Par 84, Pg. 65 Par 85, Pg. 65 Par 87. 498. Medicaid, private pay, Medicare and insurance funds reported as intended for employee benefits, the Defendant knowingly made, used, or caused to be made or used, false records or statements material to an obligation for the Government to pay money, and/or knowingly concealed or knowingly and improperly receiving funds which were not used for their intended and represented purpose. Intervention Pg. 64 Par 80. 499. Through the above-described conduct, Owner Operator Defendants knowingly presented or caused to be presented false or fraudulent reports for payment or approval; and/or made, used, or caused to be made or used, a false record or statement to get false or fraudulent claims paid or approved; and/or made, used, or caused to be made or used, false records or statements to conceal that Owner Operator Defendants were diverting funds. Intervention Pg. 64 Par 82. 500. Through the above-described conduct, agents of Employers knowingly presented or caused to be presented false or fraudulent reports for payment or approval; and/or made, used, or caused to be made or used, a false record or statement to get false or fraudulent claims paid or approved; and/or made, used, or caused to be made or used, false records or statements to conceal the diversion of Plan Assets. Specifically, agents filed on behalf 87

Alternative Employment Practice Percy Program